SODIUM

Immunotherapy outcomes, surprisingly, are strongly improved with sufficient and even higher levels of circulating sodium during active therapy windows. In particular studies in metastatic kidney and bladder cancer patient records report some remarkable effects, as well as melanoma and lung cancers. Including for complete theraputic response levels, which are very limited in the low sodium group. Researchers are suggesting sodium level is a more accurate biomarker of success even than PD-L1 immune cell expression levels, the traditional key marker followed in oncology. Furthermore, there are suggestions to actively increase sodium levels before immunotherapy (Highlight 1). But not for other oncology treatment, so far.

There is increasing evidence that having enough sodium in circulation during other oncology treatments helps increase their effects, examples here include recent esophageal cancer patient data for chemo and radiotherapy (Highlight 4) and similar for lung cancer with TKI therapy (References). In advanced metastatic stages studies recommend monitoring and restoring sodum levels based on the observed outcomes vs sodium levels at discharge. Studies highlight the higher natural range of 140 to 145mmol/l. Most treatments and side effects can deplete sodium. Alarmingly, its very common during immunotherapy and there are studies reporting one to two thirds of patients reach deficient levels. Here the data shows more severe lack of sodium after 3 to 5 weeks of therapy in substantial numbers https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12206762/

This low circulating sodium so called hyponatremia (below 135 mmol/L) is a common finding in cancer patient case data. Its well known as a biomarker for small cell lung cancer. But its fairly common in most cancers and can be worsened by onoclogy treatments, especially chemotherapy. As with many compounds, cancer upregulates its access to sodium to fuel its growth and spread. Inhibiting this activity with re-purposed drugs is an active area of research, including as an anti-metastatic therapy. An example here are emerging pilot studies with lidocaine the surgical anesthetic in head and neck cancers. Research overall suggests that re-balancing circulating sodium levels may help to  counter this dysregulated sodium metabolism and aid oncology outcomes.

Beyond immunotherapy, a large meta-analysis in over 3000 patients treated with erlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, reported that patients with sufficient sodium , above 135mmol/L , had half the progression risk. And almost identical data has been published for kidney cancer patients treated with TKIs. So very similar to the effects in immunotherapy. A lot of pre-clinical evidence, perhaps surprisingly, shows low sodium to be a marker for increased metastatic spread of cancer too.

Put together, sustaining healthy natural sodium levels is reported to play a crucial role in immunotherapy, and a beneficial effect based on oncology patient data especially in advanced disease. And there are very similar findings in targeted therapy with TKIs. In contrast to this calcium, magnesium and potassium do not affect responses and risk levels. Though of course these minerals can have other important actions to contribute in systemic health.

ANTI-METASTATIC ACTIONS

TYPICAL ABSORPTION LEVELS

High

EXAMPLES OF IMPROVED OUTCOMES

YES

PRE-DIAGNOSIS OR PREVENTION

NO

Highlighted Studies

We found a linear correlation of baseline serum sodium and chloride with prognosis across both trials, which was not found for potassium, magnesium and calcium. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic capacity of sodium was limited to patients receiving ICI as compared to the control group. Interestingly, in both studies, the chance of achieving an objective response was highest in the patient subgroup with high baseline serum sodium levels of > 140 mmol/L (Complete response in 17.9% vers...

This study highlights that ICI-treated patients with higher sodium levels had significantly better OS, PFS, and anti-tumor responses. Baseline serum sodium levels could be cost-effective and valuable predictive biomarker for ICIs across diverse tumor types and ICI agents….Multivariate analysis revealed that serum sodium levels between 135–140 mmol/L were an independent predictor of improved OS (HR: 0.58) and PFS (HR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.58–0.99) and those with levels > 140 mmo...

Our study evaluated patients with different cancer diagnoses using various ICI agents. Despite this diversity, the study consistently demonstrated the adverse prognostic impact of hyponatremia in patients undergoing ICI treatment. This suggests that the negative effect of hyponatremia on ICI therapy may be independent of the primary cancer diagnosis or the specific ICI drug used. Certainly, unraveling the mechanisms responsible for the potential adverse impact of low serum sodium levels on IC...

We confirmed that EC patients with baseline serum sodium levels ≤ 140.0 mmol/L had significantly shorter survival than those with high serum sodium levels (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained by performing a subset analysis of the different treatment groups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). In addition, Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that the risk of mortality in the low serum sodium level group was 2.15 times that of the high serum sodium level ...

TABLE OF REFERENCES

Help grow the evidence. Login and use the form, or try Feedback and Ideas below.

URLRatingHighlightHighlight 2
https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(24)00745-7/fulltext5We found a linear correlation of baseline serum sodium and chloride with prognosis across both trials, which was not found for potassium, magnesium and calcium. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic capacity of sodium was limited to patients receiving ICI as compared to the control group. Interestingly, in both studies, the chance of achieving an objective response was highest in the patient subgroup with high baseline serum sodium levels of > 140 mmol/L (IMmotion151: Complete response in 17.9% versus 2.0% in patients with mRCC with baseline sodium < 135 mmol/L). Serum sodium outperformed tumor PD-L1 expression as a predictor for immunotherapy efficacy.In this study, we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first unbiased analysis of the prognostic value of baseline electrolyte levels in predicting the response to immunotherapy. Using data of two phase 3 clinical trials (mRCC: IMmotion151; mUC: IMvigor), our findings demonstrate that increased baseline sodium levels predict immunotherapy response and favorable outcomes in patients with mRCC and mUC who are undergoing immunotherapy. Remarkably, serum sodium levels outperform the predictive power of PD-L1 status, the only widely used biomarker for immunotherapy response in the field of uro-oncology
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14737159.2025.2472946?af=R4.5Multivariate analysis revealed that serum sodium levels between 135–140 mmol/L were an independent predictor of improved OS (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44–0.77) and PFS (HR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.58–0.99) and those with levels > 140 mmol/L had an even lower HR of 0.43 (95% CI:0.31–0.62) for OS and HR of 0.62 (95% CI:0.45–0.86) for PFSThis study highlights that ICI-treated patients with higher sodium levels had significantly better OS, PFS, and anti-tumor responses. Baseline serum sodium levels could be cost-effective and valuable predictive biomarker for ICIs across diverse tumor types and ICI agents.
https://tlcr.amegroups.org/article/view/48124/html4.5Of 10,888 identified titles, 14 articles were included in the review including a total of 4,364 NSCLC patients. In 13 of the 14 articles, hyponatremia was found to be significantly correlated to a shorter OS. Ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. Here, patients with hyponatremia had a significantly shorter OS compared with patients with normal sodium level {pooled HR =2.02 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.65–2.47]}. Two out of four studies found hyponatremia to be associated with a reduced progression free survival (PFS). Normalization of the sodium level during treatment was found to be associated with a prolonged PFS and OS in one study.This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that hyponatremia is a relative common condition in NSCLC patients. Moreover, it was found to be associated with an increased mortality as a more than 100% increase in mortality risk was observed in hyponatremic patients compared with eunatremic patients. This finding was consistent after accounting for a possible publication bias; even though, the pooled HR was reduced. The majority of studies were retrospective studies and the overall quality of the available studies was low. Yet, the association was unchanged after omitting low quality studies from the analysis. Despite these concerns, for the first time this review collects the available literature and evaluates the association in NCSLC patients.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/28121534Our findings revealed that a pre-ICI sodium level greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L was associated with a significant improvement in OS. Furthermore, patients with sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L after starting treatment showed longer PFS and OS. In addition, patients with sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L at both pre-ICI and post-ICI evaluation had longer PFS and OS compared with those with at least a sodium level less than 140 mEq/L. Notably, patients with sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L at the post-ICI evaluation and both pre-ICI and post-ICI evaluation demonstrated a better DCR. These results are consistent with those of our recent study,26 which showed that lower, but in range (≥135 and <140 mEq/L), sodium levels were associated with worse PFS and OS in patients with mRCC receiving TKIs as first-line therapyPatients with post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L had longer PFS (11.1 months [95% CI, 8.5-1.5 months] vs 5.1 months [95% CI, 4.1-7.5 months]; P = .01) and OS (32.9 months [95% CI, 25.1-42.6 months] vs 17.1 months [95% CI, 12.6-24.5 months]; P = .006) compared with patients with sodium values less than 140 mEq/L. Patients with both pre-ICI and post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L exhibited a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with those with a value less than 140 mEq/L (PFS, 11.5 months [95% CI, 8.8-16.4 months] vs 5.8 months [95% CI, 4.4-8.3 months]; P = .008); OS, 37.6 months [95% CI, 29.0-49.9 months] vs 19.4 months [95% CI, 14.1-24.5 months]; P = .01). Moreover, sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L were associated with significantly better DCR than lower sodium levels.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4142674/4To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate the association of hyponatremia on outcome of mRCC patients treated with targeted agents. Hyponatremia was found to be associated with a significant lower OS, TTF, and DCR at first staging evaluation in mRCC patients receiving targeted therapy. Hyponatremic patients had 57% and 51% increase in the risk of treatment failure or death, respectivelyOur data demonstrate that hyponatremia in mRCC patients treated with anti-VEGF agents had poor prognosis compared to patients with baseline normal serum sodium levels. These data are in agreement with a British study in which a low preoperative sodium concentration was found to be associated with reduced survival in patients with RCC undergoing nephrectomy.. In our study, we have observed that hyponatremia was present in 15% of patients at baseline.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/45867294The PFS and OS rates of patients in the low serum sodium levels group were significantly lower than those in the high serum sodium levels group (p < 0.001). A similar association between PFS/OS and sodium levels was observed in the treatment subgroups. The univariate analysis showed that low serum sodium levels, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), clinical N stage, tumor site, clinical stage, and treatment mode were the influencing factors of OS. Multivariate analyses indicated that low baseline serum sodium levels were an independent prognostic marker of poor PFS (HR, 1.744; 95% CI, 1.248-2.437; p = 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio (HR), 2.125; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.555-2.904; p < 0.001). Pretreatment levels of low serum sodium could be a new and helpful serum biomarker of the prognosis of EC patients receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.We confirmed that EC patients with baseline serum sodium levels ≤ 140.0 mmol/L had significantly shorter survival than those with high serum sodium levels (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained by performing a subset analysis of the different treatment groups (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). In addition, Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed that the risk of mortality in the low serum sodium level group was 2.15 times that of the high serum sodium level group, and the risk of disease progression was 1.744 times. Our study demonstrated that the decrease in serum sodium concentrations before initial treatment was inversely associated with the outcomes of EC patients.
https://www.oncotarget.com/article/13372/text/4Sixty-nine patients (16%) presented with hyponatremia at the start of first-line therapy. The median OS was 8.78 months in Group A and 15.5 months in Group B (p < 0.001), while the median PFS was 4.1 months and 6.3 months respectively (p = 0.24). In Group A, median OS was significantly higher in patients who normalized their sodium levels (11.6 vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.0435). Similarly, the median PFS was significantly higher in patients who normalized their sodium levels (6.7 vs. 3.3 months, p = 0.011). At multivariate analysis, sodium normalization was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS. Sodium normalization during first-line therapy is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in patients with advanced lung cancer treated with first-line therapies. Frequent clinical monitoring and prompt treatment of hyponatremia should be emphasized to optimize the outcome of these patients.Our results are consistent with those reported in SCLC by Hansen et al. that showed that hyponatremia was associated with a lower median OS in a retrospective study of 453 SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy. The study showed also that patients who did not fully correct serum sodium values within the first two cycles of chemotherapy had a worse outcome [25]. Hence, our results showed that the correction of sodium levels was associated with significantly higher OS (11.6 vs. 4.7 months) and PFS (6.7 vs. 3.3 months) in patients with NSCLC treated with first-line therapy. Lack of hyponatremia normalization was associated with worse OS and PFS at univariate and multivariate analyses. Thus suggesting that an early detection, a careful monitoring and supportive therapy of hyponatremia can help to improve the medical case and prognosis.
https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/34/12/74614The median PFS for patients with normal natrium levels was 2.0 vs. 1.6 months for patients with low natrium levels. The median OS for patients with normal natrium levels was 10.9 vs. 4.6 months for patients with low natrium levels (p<0.001) (Figure 1). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that EGFR mutation status (HR=0.43, p<0.001), PS (HR=1.28, p=0.007) and natrium levels (HR=1.25, p=0.041) were significant independent factors for PFS, whereas the EGFR mutation status (HR=0.58), PS (HR=1.82), stage (HR=1.49) and natrium levels (HR=1.87) were significant independent factors for OSThe incidence of hyponatremia in patients with SCLC is about 20% for levels below 135 mmol/l and about 10% for levels below 130 mmol/l (12, 15, 16). On the other hand, only a few studies have focused on hyponatremia in NSCLC patients have been published. In our study, we assesed hypontaremia in 21.5% patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. This is in agreement with Bose et al., who reported hyponatremia in 20% of NSCLC patients. On the contrary, several authors have reported lower incidence of hyponatremia in NSCLC patients
https://academic.oup.com/ckj/article/18/3/sfaf023/7979007?login=false3.5Nonetheless, we observed an improvement in patient survival, both with metastatic and non-metastatic cancer, by correcting hyponatraemia to at least 125 mEq/l at the time of discharge. Interestingly, an increase in sodium level of 1 mEq/l was associated with improved survival in the metastatic cancer subgroup but not in the non-metastatic subgroup. This might be related to the variability of the hyponatraemia correction rate, which can impact of mortality. Our study demonstrated that upon discharge of metastatic cancer patients, improved sodium in patients with severe hyponatraemia (<125 mEq/l) on admission is associated with improved survival. However, metastatic disease itself is an independent predictor of poor survival. We do recommend correcting sodium in advanced cancer patients, but also to be aware that hyponatraemia in itself could be an indicator of progressive disease.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8370306/N/ASuch sodium-transporting proteins include voltage-gated sodium channels, especially its hypoxia-promoted persistent current, epithelial sodium channels, and transient receptor potential channels. Thus, hyponatremia follows cancer, whereby drop in blood serum level occurs as a result of uptake of sodium from extracellular fluid by cancer cells. Indeed, the sodium content of cancer cells/tissues is higher than normal. In turn, the rise in the intracellular sodium concentration brings about a range of cellular effects, including extracellular acidification that promotes invasiveness and thus leads to poor prognosis. This perspective offers novel therapies for cancer and the associated hyponatremia. Several studies have followed the survival of SCLC patients, comparing the prognosis of those with and without hyponatremia. One such study monitored 453 SCLC cases in Denmark over a period of 10 years.50 It was thus discovered that the survival time for SCLC patients with hyponatremia was some 50% shorter than those without. Similar findings were reported earlier for patients of non-SCLC, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6557976/1 Although high salt fed tumor-bearing mice showed alterations in T cell populations, the effect seemed to be largely independent of adaptive immune cells. In contrast, depletion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) significantly reverted the inhibitory effect on tumor growth. In line with this, high salt conditions almost completely blocked murine MDSC function in vitro. Importantly, similar effects were observed in human MDSCs isolated from cancer patients. Thus, high salt conditions seem to inhibit tumor growth by enabling more pronounced anti-tumor immunity through the functional modulation of MDSCs. Our findings might have critical relevance for cancer immunotherapy.It would be of interest to test in future studies if the functional changes in MDSCs under high salt exposure are also related to epigenetic remodeling and changes in immuno-metabolism as observed for M2-type macrophages (3). In summary, we show that a high salt diet significantly delays tumor growth in two independent murine tumor transplantation models. This effect seems to be mediated through enhanced anti-tumor immunity by a functional inactivation of MDSCs. Since high salt conditions also affected human MDSCs in a similar manner, our data suggest that the targeting of this mechanism could potentially be a novel beneficial strategy to block MDSC function in settings of cancer immunotherapy.

Help grow the community

Join the Pubmedders subscriber base

Get our monthly email newletter – designed so you can give us your opinions, thoughts and feedback…

ALL contributions are invested into growing the site to help others.